Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0806120190490040411
´ëÇÑ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö
2019 Volume.49 No. 4 p.411 ~ p.422
Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of Nursing Students¡¯ Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision Making Scale
Yu Mi

Eun Young
White KA
Kang Kyung-Ja
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to adapt, modify, and validate the Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision-Making Scale (NASC-CDM¨Ï) for Korean nursing students.

Methods: Participants were 183 nursing students with clinical practice experience in two nursing colleges. The construct validity and reliability of the final Korean version of the NASC-CDM¨Ï were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and testing of internal consistency reliability. For adaptation and modification, the instrument was translated from English to Korean. Expert review and a cross-sectional survey were used to test the instrument¡¯s validity.

Results: The Korean version of the NASC-CDM¨Ï (KNASC-CDM) was composed of 23 items divided into four dimensions: (i) Listening fully and using resources to gather information; (ii) Using information to see the big picture; (iii) Knowing and acting; and (iv) Seeking information from clinical instructors. The instrument explained 60.1% of the total variance for self-confidence and 63.1% of the variance for anxiety; Cronbach¡¯s a was .93 for self-confidence and .95 for anxiety.

Conclusion: The KNASC-CDM can be used to identify anxiety and self-confidence in nursing students¡¯ clinical decision-making in Korea. However, further research should be done to test this instrument, as it is classified differently from the original NASC-CDM¨Ï version.
KEYWORD
Anxiety, Clinical Decision-Making, Nursing Students, Reliability and Validity
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed